Beloved, the year 2009 draws to a close with a country economically, politically and institutionally in the knee because of a wicked government and opposition that has not always done his duty in a compact way and without delay, that criticism certainly can not put down 'Italy of Values. Our party ... to be the subject of furious attacks, supported by a media wall compact perennial that wants to confine the opposition, fearing that the country understands that there is in us the seed of a real alternative to this political class. Every opportunity has been good in 2009, and will in the future to put us in a bad light because they are afraid of public opinion against our moral integrity that we always see with your back straight and never prone to convenient compromises. The response of our good work, however, the continuously collect in the streets, among the workers in the factories, and the web that we see today the undisputed leader among the parties for dialogue with citizens and the transparency of our political action. The last attack was thrown in Following the gesture of a madman who has hurt the prime minister. Some of the media and many politicians have mounted an unjustified political and media campaign to find in my person in the Italy of Values \u200b\u200band the moral principals that have armed the hand. Nothing wrong with this witch hunt, if this happens is because the Italy of Values \u200b\u200bfor the whole year has played its role by denouncing the opposition by force, without rebates even to the other opposition parties, the wickedness of a Government every time you wanted to reduce the space of democracy. I extend to you all my best wishes for the holidays, especially those in which the crisis has not left even a panettone to be cut, and I would like to add that a promise under the tree for each: the renewed commitment, even for the coming year, in every form of abuse of the institutions, any law that could lead to the deprivation of individual liberties and constitutional rights of citizens. A short commitment to defend democracy and the deepest values \u200b\u200bof the state. Antonio Di Pietro
We speak today of some changes taking place for pensioners, from 1 January 2010 will come into force the new transformation coefficients. Since 1995, with the Dini reform was introduced in Italy for workers who, on 31 December 1995 were under 18 years of contributions, a new system of calculating the pension is defined contribution system. The contribution system provides that the pension is calculated on the basis of all the contributions to be paid throughout the working life of each worker. Then, at the time of retirement, ie at the end of working life, contributions which were paid by each worker are added together: in this way we obtain what is called the contribution base Overall, that is the pillar on which the individual calculates retirement. Must be taken into account two very important elements: the first is that the annual contributions are revalued each year based on the five-year rate of change of gross domestic product. This process should, in theory, be used to allow recovery of the decrease in purchasing power due to inflation, so each year the employee contributions are revalued on the basis of this rate of change of GDP. The second element that we must take into account is that the mast, that this amount of annual contributions, is then multiplied by the so-called transformation coefficients. These transformation coefficients transform In practice, the mast, that this total amount, into an annuity: if we think about it, the pension is an annuity that is derived from a capital that is accumulated over the years by the worker. What will happen next year from January 1, 2010, is to be introduced in the new transformation coefficients: they are real tables which set of multipliers based on the age of the person at the time she retires, which take account of life expectancy. For example, if the January 1, 2010 will retire with 59 years of age and a number of years of contributions will have a conversion ratio that is smaller compared to that of another worker who will retire with the same contribution years, but perhaps with an age of 61 years, ie the higher the age and the higher the conversion ratio, the lower is the age at which you retire, the smaller the coefficient of transformation.
What is the idea? The idea is that if life expectancy is now estimated that, for example, of 81 years and one retires at 59, is expected to enjoy retirement of the check for at least 22 years, that is 81 years of life expectancy and 59, which are the years in which he begins to retire. Who should instead retire at 61 years will only have twenty years of retirement, which is two years younger, so the transformation coefficients into account, in some way, this different life expectancy. To maintain balance in the pension system applies a principle that, the greater the number of years over which you will enjoy retirement, the smaller is the coefficient of transformation. Periodically, say every three years, these tables will be revised in a less favorable for new retirees: As, over the years, we will have a life expectancy improves, that we will live more years, these new tables will account of this higher life expectancy, this many years of retirement and will be, in some ways less favorable to the retirees. We must start by saying that this change, which takes place from January 1, 2010, applies only to new retirees, and those who are already retired are not affected by this reform. This new system applies in particular to those who will retire with the contributory scheme, what I just described, so those who were under 18 years of contributions December 31, 1995. Essentially applies especially to young people, those who have fewer years of contributions and to those who in future will gradually with the contribution system.
What are the issues that arise?
Some recent estimates, made in the past days, show that with these new tables processing those who will retire Jan. 1, 2010, again, with the contribution system, so older workers, who have completed forty years of contributions and retire with the pay system, but only new retirees who had less than eighteen years at December 31, 1995, these new retirees have a pension, on the basis of these new transformation coefficients will be between 0.8 and 3 , 7% less than those who, for example, will retire or be retired in November or December this year, 2009, with the same number of contribution years. These new factors change involving a reduction of net pension, which will be received by those who will retire next year. What is the question that arises? The question that arises relates to two aspects: the first question that many have is why the re-evaluation system of contributions which I have explained before, is calculated on the basis of developments in the gross domestic product, that is because in order to take into account the risk a devaluation of the money paid is taken into account the rate of GDP growth, and we were only chosen as an indicator or index of infringement, as typically is done in order to take account of the purchasing power. In particular, Italy's GDP growth rate is very low for several years: think that in 2008 the GDP declined by 1% in 2009, this year, probably the Italian GDP will fall by 5, 4%. So tomorrow's pensioners, the youth of today who will retire in a few years to have these years, for 2008 to 2009 and perhaps also in 2010, a decrease in the value of their contributions for this year because, as I told, the appreciation of these contributions is made on the basis of the development of GDP in the five-year period, so you can even have a situation of a devaluation of these contributions. A question that arises is: Is it right, it is correct, it is permissible to use the growth rates of GDP as a way to re-evaluate the contributions paid by workers in the contributory scheme? First question. Second question: is it sensible that this re-evaluation system is determined not only on the years from which actually introduces the contribution system but the entire post and then be applied retrospectively for previous years? Also in this respect is a fair system of calculation of this kind? This also with respect to the transformation coefficients, which is not that only apply to three years related to the introduction, but are applied to everything the riser. There are problems in terms of equity, fair treatment for those who will retire with effect from 1 January next year with a contributory scheme. I repeat once again: we are talking about mainly young people. That said, however, we must not hide some structural problems that affect the pension system: pension expenditure in Italy is twice that of other countries in the OECD, that of the other rich countries. In Italy the relationship between pensions and the gross domestic product is 14%, compared to 7% of the OECD average. Pensions in Italy account for a total of 30% of the budget, compared with around 16% on average across OECD countries and also in terms of contributions paid by employees, we must take into account that it is very expensive, because about 33% of gross wages to finance the end of social security contributions, the OECD average is 21%, which is much lower. This increased spending on pensions is of course the expense of other expenses that may be made: both expenditure on the social front - and we support the poorest families - and expenses such as education, research and technological innovation. If you use this large sum of money for pensions means that you can not make other investments. Another consideration: the age of retirement in Italy is now similar to that of other countries, we are talking about 65 years for men, which is the age that is adopted in most developed countries. But if we look at the average effective age of retirement, ie the age at which Italian workers actually retire, we find a great anomaly: in Italy the average effective retirement age for men is 58 years, women is 57, then it means going into retirement well before the date theoretical, theoretical age. To get an idea of \u200b\u200bcomparison, in Germany the average effective age of retirement is 63 years, 63 against 65, that is only three years before; in Italy is 58 years compared with 65 the average male retiring seven years early. This is a problem and is a very serious, very serious and is one of the reasons why it should be addressed with courage is a measure that seeks to raise the minimum age should as soon as possible the effective retirement age. If the government had the strength and courage to raise that minimum effective, it could be considered to recalculate some of these factors we have discussed and processing to make the system somewhat fairer. We believe that in 2011 the minimum age should retire in Italy will be 60 years in 2013 to 61 years and so will away, so it will be a very slow process of adjustment in the retirement age. What is maybe we should have the courage to raise the retirement age and, thus, to release additional resources that could be used to make whole the pension system more equitable, especially to protect the younger generation, who are likely to retire with a coverage rate, and with a pension that is equal to 30 / 35% of salary if they were employed, a coverage rate which is well below the 75 / 78% of previous generations. There is a problem of equity between generations, there is a lack of courage on the part of the government to address this issue and to speak in a clear and transparent to the Italians and the young people of how things are right now.
The purple square, with hundreds of thousands of young people and families, he marched in a peaceful but determined. From yesterday to contest in Parliament and the country will be easier for the center and Italy of Values \u200b\u200bbecause we know we have an entire nation behind us supporting our work.
With the square yesterday, we asked for the resignation of Berlusconi for his inability to solve the country's problems and to prevent that his action, in constant conflict of interest, can only serve to resolve his personal problems with the usual ad personam laws to which we always oppose.
RELATED LINKS: http://italiadeivalori.antoniodipietro.com/articoli/politica/no_bday_contano_solo_i_fatti.php
Sexual violence against women is a serious social problem that is difficult to remedy, the national news almost every day addressing the topic "violence" underage girl raped by a pack; old woman harassed, etc etc.. Sensitive to this problem Sara Fresi (IDV) is is given to the Sports Association to organize courses Meiji Kan Defence Staff, for women and girls, that start from 14 December. The courses will be taught by Maestro Stefano Pucci, a graduate and former Technical Olympic Committee (to 11 years) of the Penitentiary Police and the athlete blue Virginia Pucci, federal training and vice world champion of Karate. The course is aimed at girls and women with an age between 14 and 60 years for a maximum of 30 participants (two groups will be formed of 15 persons each). The courses aim to teach participants to important concepts, with practical applications, useful for self-defense in case of attack by intruders who do not have of firearms. In 90% of women who have attended the courses have since acquired a technical mastery and a confidence of character that are then found to be important factors not only in case of aggression, but also in everyday interpersonal relations.
Sara Fresi - Responsible Citizen Women IDV Civitavecchia
WOMEN AGAINST VIOLENCE TO A POINT OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT
Rome - On the 28th December, from 9.00 to 14.00, Hotel Palatino was held the conference "Violence and Abuse of Justice and Prevention", organized and highly Women wanted by the Regional Coordination Italy of Values. This event saw the presence of many women and especially men who have shown strong sensitivity to the problem. The conference was opened by Paola Piccolo, organizational contact IDV Lazio, then took the floor to Mr.. Angela Leonardi Regional Coordinator IDV Women who stressed the commitment of all responsible citizens of the region that have helped to write a book that was distributed to those present and a motion given to Sen. Stephen Pedica (IDV) on violence against women. Sen. Pedica burden. Claudio Bucci judged the positive affirmation of women in the party, later intervened Alfonso Sabella, Judge of the Criminal Court of Rome, who commented on the current and inadequate laws protecting women in cases of violence, harassment or stalking. Mr.. Laura Guercio, Criminal Lawyer and President of the Law has bewitched the audience with a masterly speech by analyzing some of the laws of the Penal Code. Federico Bianchi Psychotherapist Expert in Children and Adolescents has made its share these experiences to return to normal children who are victims of violence, Mrs. Roberta Lerici Head of the Department of Children IDV Lazio looked at some newspaper articles about harassment and violence on minorities' inside of schools, highlighting the facts Rignano Flaminio. Cristina Michelini, Regional Coordinator of the Working Groups IDV, examined in detail the phenomenon of bullying at work, Mrs. Marisa Ayroldi (IDV) cited the psychological aspects of domestic violence perpetrated against women; Sara Fresi, Representative Women IDV Civitavecchia, outlined the statistics relating to violence against women and the causes that have affected many women psychologically to a physical inferiority that often make them unable to respond to aggression. The conclusions were made by Paola Calorenne, National Youth Coordinator IDV, which anticipated initiatives, political and social changes that involve the female component of the Regional Coordination IDV. Women of Italy of Values \u200b\u200bagree on the fundamental importance of the creation a wide consultation with the women of other parties on these issues because there can be no division.
are counted in Italy, in 2008, over 8 million poor, 13% of the population, with a monthly expenditure of less than $ 999 per capita. This phenomenon is particularly widespread in the southern regions: the South 24% of households below the poverty line, five times more than in northern regions. If we consider the families with three or more minor children, the share of poor families in southern exceed 40%. The risk of poverty in Italy grows decreasing age, then you are much more at risk of being poor, if you are young than the elderly: it is a fairly new phenomenon, 30 years ago the situation was exactly reversed, was much more likely to be poor, if you was older than younger people. Among the minors at this time in Italy 19% of minors in Italy belongs to the category of the poor, while only 8 of the sixties, 5% belong to the poor, so we confirm that with decreasing age increases the probability of being poor.
This phenomenon, namely that of child poverty, child poverty is a phenomenon that has no equal in any European country, Italy is a real anomaly in this respect and this explains why in Italy, many families can not afford to make the second or third child, because so many families in Italy are only a child, or even us are couples who do not have children at all. Why? Why have another child may present a risk of falling into the category of the poor and, especially, because in Italy there are tools to help children, there are tools to help families: Most of our welfare system has been consists mainly of support to older people. In general, poverty in Italy is associated with what? At low education, so the lower the level of education, the more likely you are poor, low-profile professionals and to the risk of being excluded from the labor market. 34% of households where the breadwinner is unemployed and poor. The very important aspect to focus on is the very structure of our system of social production, which is a system of social production, which provides a kind of guaranteed minimum income for older people: think of the so-called social pension, but does not provide a minimum income guaranteed for children or minors. We, of Italy of Values, we think this is a true national emergency, it is not acceptable that a member country of the Union European Union, which is part of the seven largest industrial countries, has a quota of poverty so widespread and so pervasive, so we think it important that it is necessary to rethink our social protection system, imagining forms of income support targeted to reduce these areas of social disadvantage. As is done to fight poverty? Action should be taken first on the major items of expenditure: one of the main areas of expenditure is the expenditure for rent, housing. The rental charges are on average for Italian families, 26% of their monthly spending, so it would be important and necessary to introduce forms of rental subsidy, targeted at families poor forms of income support intended to pay the rent.
A second major item of expenditure is represented by food, which are 20% of the average monthly expenditure of Italian families: in this case it would introduce significant forms of income support, not the social card of 40 Euro introduced by Berlusconi last year, 40 Euro monthly social card are nothing to a family who needs to buy food. These affect the ability to purchase food.
Thirdly, it is to intervene on pricing of public services: I think, for example, gas and electricity. In many European countries were established forms of social citizenship, to which the poor are still guaranteed a range of services essential for living, such as gas, electricity, telephones etc., perhaps with special contracts that reduce the options, but ensure that the survival to needy families. These are actions that we believe are necessary to operate on three major items of expenditure, but in general, we believe, like Italy of Values, it is time to think of a real minimum income guarantee, a form of income to support the above families with children: it's time to reasoning of the pact between the generations and to support young families who have young children, minor children, with a form of guaranteed minimum income. This is one of the issues on which we, as the Italian reformers, we need to immediately ask for support for Italian families.
